The CC is blocked because magic armor remains. The spell will do 75 damage to the Magical armor, and 25 damage to health. So a Magic attack which does 100 damage and inflicts a CC, hitting an enemy which has 500 health, 0 Physical armor, and 300 Magical Armor. If one type of armor is gone but the other is still up, damage from the opposing type can seep through to Vitality at the same rate.

This allows for better synergy between mixed teams. Magical attacks are the reverse (67-75% to Magical, 33-25% to Physical). Keep both armors, but split the damage so that Physical attacks do, 67-75% of their damage to Physical Armor, and 33-25% of their damage to Magical Armor. The larger problem is that mixed magical/physical teams are discouraged because they have zero synergy. Taunt bounce off armor? ok, let me strip my armor down so you can taunt me wtf?Ĭombining magical and physical armor into one is TOO much of a simplification. This kind of armor system obviously come from the idea of 6 AP max bullshit some idiot in devs team think of.Įdit: beside, this armor system make some skills LITERALLY useless.

RNG adding good element for the game to feel 'alive' just as how real life is never 100%. Of all thing, combat in this game should be unpredictable because of finite enemy and finite encounters. It's just horsecrap of this armor system that make non-damage focused build go total useless. Say you have one mage that specialized on CC spells, that mage is the most useless crap ever has in party.īecause there is little damage, get punished for not focusing on 1 or 2 schools, CAN'T do jack first few turns. It isn't much different than current system, it just isn't 1+1=2 boring shit that promote 'DAMAGE! DAMAGE!' above all else. After that your chance go down gradually as enemy attack/throw spells at you. You have 100% amour on? good, you're immune to any first CC spell casted on you. The only logical choice here is adding CC resistance chance to both amour.

Free to play magic armor